top of page

No Conflict, They SAid

In Australia and around the world, legislation is being introduced that replaces sex with gender identity. Advocates insist that there is no conflict of interest. But governments are not collecting data on the impacts of this legislative change. We're worried about the impacts on women of men using women-only spaces, including but not limited to: changing rooms, fitting rooms, bathrooms, shelters, rape and domestic violence refuges, gyms, spas, sports, schools, accommodations, hospital wards, shortlists, prizes, quotas, political groups, prisons, clubs, events, festivals, dating apps, and language. If we can't collect data, we can at least collect stories. Please tell us how your use of women-only spaces has been impacted. All stories will be published anonymously. If you know of other women who have been impacted, please encourage them to tell their stories too.

This site is run from Australia, New Zealand members of the LGB Defence, AWW Inc. and supported by LGB Alliance.

AWW logo.png
LGB_LOGO_WHITE.png
  • @ConflictSaid
  • Writer: anonymous woman
    anonymous woman
  • May 8, 2021
  • 1 min read

About 15 years ago, before the current trans politics became so powerful, I came out as a lesbian and attended several organised social gatherings and support groups. Already there were trans-identified males turning up and taking part as "lesbians" and no one said anything, I think because women are so socialised to be nice. The males' behaviour was mostly ok, but just having them there made me uncomfortable and changed the vibe, it just wasn't a lesbian group any more. One male was severely mentally ill and treated the group as his personal therapy session which was exhausting and off putting for women who came there just wanting to meet each other. I'm sure things are much much worse now. I have a lesbian friend who was tricked into a date with a male and felt too scared / embarrassed to leave. It's a green light for creeps.


  • Writer: anonymous woman
    anonymous woman
  • May 7, 2021
  • 2 min read

In the past few months so many places have turned their bathrooms over to "gender neutral" that I have found myself on a number of occasions having to use these unisex toilets.


Men and women use toilets differently, it's just a fact. Women generally sit down, men generally stand up. Even the smell of urine is different. The ghastly odor that hits you as you walk into the Unisex toilets at Marrickville library is the first thing you notice - men have splashed everywhere and women are expected to wade through it. It's vile.


It's not just the toilets there though, it's the unisex toilets everywhere I have been - they all smell the same, they all have the same issues of men's piss all over the floor and women having to wade through it all. Then there are the issues of sanitary bins, having men outside in the shared wash stand areas when women are trying to wash blood out of clothing, rinse out menstrual cups etc. It has certainly made me look for any way to avoid using unisex toilets and suggesting that we are just being "fussy" is unreasonable. It is not comfortable to be trying to do makeup in mirrors where men are also in the room, and the overwhelming smell is just rank.


In the case of the Marrickville Library, it now also means that children and adults are using the same toilets and there have been a number of issues regards child safeguarding because of this. Children traditionally go into the women's toilets where they are safer. Now they go into the unisex toilets where men also have a reason to go.

The end of this madness cannot come soon enough.


I have been at my organization since 2009, and began front line in the shelter. Our shelter is an emergency shelter for women victims of domestic violence.


Maybe 7 years ago, give or take, I was told at shift exchange that an intake would be arriving from out of town later that evening. As a side note, we are single-staffed.


All I knew was the general gist of the womens crisis call, her name, and the city she was fleeing.


She arrived later that shift and what I saw on our security camera was a man with long blond hair. The individual at the door claimed they had in fact recently had twins apprehended by local children's services and that her "abuser" was a Police officer in her community, hence the reason for leaving her community.


By all accounts, I was to accept this individual, as they identified as female.


Now as a worker, at the shelter, I have never been scared during an intake. I have never been scared for the women in shelter and their children and I was told she had to be accepted.


While I was alone, the only staff member within in the shelter, the individual seeking a safe place showed me a photo album with the two twins that had been apprehended. It was disturbing as they were not actual photos - they were taken from some online source - everything from ultrasound photos to a woman's pregnant body and newborn photos.


The individual infront of me was wearing black leggings that left nothing to hide. Sitting in front of me, this person stated that they were in the early stages of pregnancy again - half way through the conversation, this person stated her stomach/abdomen was painful, like a knife being thrust into it. The individual presented a driver's licence to me that had been tampered to state that the sex was female and the name was Jessica.


I knew within a few minutes into the conversation that I could not allow this individual into the shelter. This is when I called our Executive Director. I felt little to no support with my concerns and was told that, the individual should be accepted but provided their own single room, for their safety. I asked about the safety of the other women and children in shelter. The answer I got was that, if they are uncomfortable, they can relocate to a new shelter. I was told that we have to follow Ministry guidelines.


Of course, my instinct told me this was wrong.


I eventually called a second staff member in as I knew nothing made sense and this was a security and safety issue and it was getting beyond what I can manage. I also felt that I wanted a second staff member's judgement.


To keep it brief. I made the decision that I would not accept this person into our shelter. This was with the support of the staff members that I called as back up.


I did later have to speak with the Executive Director about my decision. Her concern was largely based around this individual going to the press and saying she had been denied access to our shelter.


A few weeks later it was brought to my attention that in our province's shelter system, a man using the name of Jessica had been entering violence against women shelters. In some cases, women had been raped.


After this happened, our Management team decided that we all required to have trans awareness training. For myself, I was never told that I dealt with this situation appropriately or handled it well based on the challenges presented.


This individual claimed that we had denied her medical care. She stated that she had miscarried in our entrance way.

This is one article I could find. This was provided to me by a co-worker weeks after the incident. I felt sick to my stomach - and that is an understatement. This is the exact individual who was in our shelter. We did show many news articles to our Director, all of which she stated we were exaggerating and she felt no connection could be made.


bottom of page